Rattrap’s Rants

09 Sep

Fined for not purchasing?

I would like to see someone find the place in the US Constitution where congress has the authority to fine the citizenry for not purchasing something.

Alexis de Tocqueville famously wrote that if America were to lose its freedom, it would not be through violent foreign conquest, but rather through the “soft despotism” of innumerable governmental mandates and prohibitions, gradually whittling away at liberty and lulling the people into a sense of dependence upon the state.

It’s way past time to wake up America!

13 Aug

Government Incompetence

How is it that the government which:

  • Forced the ponzi scheme called social security on the country – now broke
  • Forced medicaid on the states – now unsustainable.
  • Forced medicare on us.  Caused them to go broke.
  • “Manages” the post office – never broke even.
  • Created Amtrak – also never broke even.

Now wants to force government run health care/insurance on us?

05 Aug

545 vs 300 million

545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits.. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red ..

If the Army &Marines are in IRAQ , it’s because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it………. Is up to you.

21 Mar

The Second American Revolution

The Second American Revolution

19 Sep

School Choice Explained

It’s obvious now…

H/T John Locke Foundation

19 Sep

Market Failure? I think NOT!

The current economic problems can be traced back to one source – Government!
Idiots in both
the Evil party and the Stupid party are to blame.

The end of fiscal conservatism is here, read them and weep, and don’t say you weren’t warned.

Walter E. Williams :: Townhall.com :: Stubborn Ignorance
http://townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/09/17/stubborn_ignorance

“These financial problems are not market failures but government
failure. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 is a federal law that
intimidated lenders into offering credit throughout their entire market
and discouraged them from restricting their credit services to low-risk
markets, a practice sometimes called redlining. The Federal Reserve
Bank, keeping interest rates artificially low, gave buyers and builders
incentive to buy and build, thereby producing the housing bubble.
Lenders were willing to make creative interest-only loans, often
high-risk “no doc” and “liar loans,” in order to allow people to buy
more housing than they could afford. Of course, with the expectation
that housing prices will continue to rise, it was no problem for
lenders and borrowers but housing prices began to fall, leaving some
people with negative home equity and banks in trouble.”

Lehman Brothers, Flood Insurance and Energy Independence | CEI
http://cei.org/2008/09/16/lehman-brothers-flood-insurance-and-energy-independence
Business
failure is not only a permissible outcome of capitalism, it’s a necessary one.
As the great economist Joseph Schumpeter has written, the process of “creative
destruction” is essential for the market to function. For innovation to
flourish and the standard of living of the populace to improve, the market must
be free to reward success and punish failure.”

“Yet much of the current
chaos is the result of attempts to steer or control markets rather than
let them be. Much of the chaos is the result of political failure.”
08 Jul

Energy Talking Points Talk-back

Okay, I’m tired of the liberal talking points on energy, so let’s dispel a few:

  1. “We can’t drill our way out of the problem” – Well no, not any more! If we had drilled in ANWR and the OCS some time ago then we would be fine. But we also can’t NOT drill. It would be the epitomy of stupidity to sit on 1.5 trillion barrels of oil and not go after it.
  2. “Even if we did drill now we would not see the oil for 7-10 years.” – If we had drilled 10 years ago when Clinton vetoed the bill to go after ANWR we would have it NOW! The most pessimistic estimates put the oil in the market at 5 years, 3 years is more likely.
  3. “If we invest in alternative/renewable energy, it will reduce our need.” – Time to market for those technologies is 5-7 years at it’s most optimistic, then the infrastructure has to be built, and people have to buy them. And if they don’t buy them, no infrastructure. doesn’t sound like that plan will help now, or later.
27 Jun

Oil, Oil everywhere, but not a drop for us…

The US sits on vast reserves of oil in ANWR, the OCS, and in shale. Yet, the short term thinking in Washington DC, FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS, has left us dependent on despotic regimes in far away places filled with people who loathe us. If we started exploring and drilling 15 years ago, we would be paying a small fraction of the cost for energy that we do now. Additionally we would have developed technologies that extracted the shale oil economically.

And don’t tell me nuclear power would help with oil costs in the US, Oil produces such a small fraction of our electricity that it wouldn’t have an effect.

27 Jun

Bailout? Get Real!

Can somebody please explain to me why congress is even debating a mortgage bailout?

What happened to personal responsibility? How is it I’m going to end up paying for someone else’s bad judgments? Both the lenders and the borrowers made bad decisions to enter the contract in the first place. But it’s a CONTRACT! So, buck up and pay for your own mistakes. You should have thought about some long term things before you signed on the line.

I shouldn’t have to pay for your mistakes, YOU SHOULD!

08 Jun

Pres. Bush is NOT a conservative

Don’t be fooled by the R party designation. He has made some conservative decisions (SCOTUS Judges Roberts and Alito, and Tax cuts) but his ideology is not conservative. For proof, look at the following items:

  1. Medicare Drug Plan
  2. Department of Homeland Security
  3. No Child Left Behind
  4. Immigration

The sum of these policy decisions has increased the size of the federal government by 37%, as well as its intrusion into your life. Numbers 1,3, and 4 are openly liberal in the design, scope, and implementation. I explained to one person who thought that I supported the President the difference between him and conservatives, along with what neo-con means. It means Socialist Hawk! If you look at the execution of domestic and foreign policies you will see this to be true.

Rattrap

© 2010 Rattrap’s Rants | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

GPS Reviews and news from GPS Gazettewordpress logo